DIANNE HEATH v MERYL ISABELLE GORDON [1993] NSWCA 133
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
DIANNE HEATH v MERYL ISABELLE GORDON
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
HANDLEY JA
8 March 1993
[1993] NSWCA 133
Handley JA. In this matter Mr Petty, onbehalf of the appellant/claimant,
moves that the appeal be dismissed with costs. Orders were also sought with a
view to crystallising the appellant's liability under the judgment entered by
Sharpe J and post-judgment interest under s 95 of the Supreme Court Act on that
judgment.
Mr Monteith has appeared in difficult circumstances for the opponent, Miss
Gordon. As a result of the proceedings he was able to receive instructions from
Miss Gordon that she would accept cheques available from the Government
Insurance Office for $95,562.21 being the balance of the original judgment and
$55,476.45 for post-judgment interest on the judgment up to and including 17
February this year.
In my opinion: for reasons which have been sufficiently discussed during
argument: there was no effective tender by the Government Insurance Office of
cheques for these sums to Miss Gordon prior to 26 February 1993. In those
circumstances: in my view the Government Insurance Office as the insurer of
Dianne Heath: remains liable for interest under s 95 up to and including the 26
February despite having on 17 February posted cheques which included interest
up to that date to the last known address of Miss Gordon. In these circumstances
Iam able to make the following orders:- 1. I order that the appeal be dismissed
at the request of the appellant with costs: including any reserved costs: up to and
including 11 February 1993 when the respondent through her solicitor: declined
to sign a consent order having that result. 2. I order that the respondent: Meryl
Isabelle Gordon: pay the costs of the appeal since 11 February: including the
costs of the notice of motion of | March. Costs to be set off. 3. I order that the
appellant pay interest on the balance of the judgment under s 95 of the Supreme
Court Act from and including 18 February 1993: to and including 26 February
1993: but shall not be liable for further interest thereafter. 4. I order that the
additional interest for the period between 26 February 1993 be fixed at the sum
of $265.09. 5. I order that the post-judgment interest under s 95 of the Supreme
Court Act on the unpaid balance of the original judgment up to and including 17
February 1993 be fixed at the sum of $55:476.45.
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.