NSW Caselaw
HUME v HARRIS SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
5 MEAGHER JA, HANDLEY JA and Cripps JA 25 March 1993
[1993] NSWCA 140 Meagher JA. In this matter the appeal will be dismissed with costs for the reasons given by his Honour below, as interpreted in the submissions of the respondent.
15 Orders accordingly.
Counsel for the appellant: G Charteris Solicitors for the appellant: Roslyn O'Reilly 20 Counsel for the respondent: L M Morris QC/ T Watts
Solicitors for the respondent: MacKenzie and Vendanega
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate