NSW Caselaw
TAGGETT v THE COUNCIL OF THE SHIRE OF TWEED
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
CLARKE, HANDLEY and SHELLER JJ 27 and 28 April 1993, 3 November 1993 [1993] NSWCA 260
ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING — existing use rights — incidental and ancillary uses. ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING — existing use of drain in wetlands — illegal widening without consent — evidentiary presumption against wrongdoer. ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING — mandatory injunction — _ certainty. INJUNCTION — environmental planning — mandatory injunction — certainty. EVIDENCE — presumption against wrongdoer.
The appellants purchased rural property near Pottsville south of Murwillumbah in May 1985 which became subject to State Environment Planning Policy No 14 - Coastal Wetlands (SEPP 14) in December 1985. CL7 of SEPP 14 prohibited the clearing, draining or filling of the wetlands without consent. After the commencement of SEPP 14 the appellants undertook extensive clearing and draining work within the wetlands for agricultural and grazing purposes. The Council commenced Class 4 proceedings in the Land and Environment Court. The trial Judge rejected the appellants' claim that they had existing use rights for purposes other than cattle grazing and held that the timber clearing and drain widening contravened SEPP 14. After the trial Judge had delivered reasons for judgment and adjourned the proceedings for argument on costs and the form of the orders, the Council applied for additional declarations in relation to further drainage work subsequently undertaken by the appellants in another part of their property. The trial Judge granted such declarations.
Held:
(1) The appellants had been denied procedural fairness in relation to the additional declarations as the existing use rights in respect of the BLM drain had not been fully litigated;
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate