NSW Caselaw
KARON BIRKETT (as next friend to ELLIOT BIRKETT) v CENTRAL SYDNEY AREA HEALTH SERVICE
NEW SOUTH WALES SUPREME COURT
KIRBY P, MEAGHER and HANDLEY JJA 6 June 1994
[1994] NSWCA 25
Kirby P. Despite Mr Kalfas' valiant effort to put everything that could possibly be put in challenging the order of Bryson J on the question of the determination of costs, the Court is of the view that leave to appeal should be refused in this case.
The reasons have been sufficiently adumbrated during argument in exchanges between the Court and counsel. There is no error whatever in the determination of the costs order by Bryson J. This being the case, I would refuse leave to appeal.
I would propose that the summons be dismissed with costs.
Meagher JA. I agree. Handley JA. I agree. Kirby P. So is the order of the Court.
Orders accordingly.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate