COSTAIN AUSTRALIA LTD v KANE PLANT HIRE PTY LTD [1994] NSWCA 66
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
COSTAIN AUSTRALIA LTD v KANE PLANT HIRE PTY LTD
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
COLE JA
5 September 1994
[1994] NSWCA 66
Cole JA I have before me two notices of motion. The first is filed on 25 August
1991. Appearance on behalf of the respondent has been announced by the
solicitor for the appellant.
By consent, I make orders 1 and 3 sought in the Notice of Motion filed 25
August 1994. O2 sought in this Notice of Motion is not consented to. It is an
application seeking a stay of execution. The only basis advanced for that stay is
that there would be no injury or damage to the respondent if it were granted. That,
in my view, is not a sufficient reason for the granting of a stay. I decline to make
order 2 in the Notice of Motion sought by the applicant.
There is a second Notice of Motion filed in Court today which is an application
for expedition of this appeal. The events in question happened in December 1986
and January 1987, proceedings were commenced in 1989, the matter was heard
in the District Court in September 1993. It is now September 1994 and the basis
upon which expedition is sought is that because of an application to amend
permitted at the trial it may be that the appellant, if it is unsuccessful in its appeal,
it may have some cause of action against a third party which would expire by
March 1995. Accordingly, the appellant would like to have this matter disposed
of by this Court by that time.
I do not regard that as a sufficient ground for expedition and the Notice of
Motion filed in Court today seeking expedition is dismissed.
There is no order for costs on that Notice of Motion.
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.