NSW Caselaw
PRECISION RUBBER SERVICES v PARRAMATTA CITY COUNCIL SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
5 Kirpy P, PRIESTLEY JA and CLARKE JA 24 April 1995
[1995] NSWCA 377 PRACTICE & PROCEDURE — Court of Appeal — interlocutory decision — preliminary question — whether leave timely — held: Summons dismissed — observations on the disadvantages of appeals against orders in separate questions — points argued reserved for appeal against final orders.
15 Kirby P. [Editor's Note: This graphic cannot be reproduced by electronic publishing. ] Orders accordingly. Counsel for the claimant: W R Davison SC Solicitors for the claimant: Baker and McKenzie Counsel for the opponent: P C Tomasetti
25 Solicitors for the opponent: Storey and Gough
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate