NSW Caselaw
BUD-PAK PTY LTD v ADAMSTOWN ENGINEERING PTY LTD SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
KIRBY P 13 November 1995 [1995] NSWCA 64
PRACTICE & PROCEDURE — stay — order for costs — appeal belatedly filed — upon assumption that no appear would be lodged, solicitor for unsuccessful plaintiff invites solicitor for successful defendant to prepare bill of costs in assessable form — bill prepared — late application made for leave to appeal out of time — primary decision (Ireland J) rests substantially on credit findings — difficulties of disturbing such findings — whether stay of execution of costs order should be provided — held: (1) In considering the application, the Court should take into account: (a) the fact of appeal and defence of appellate process; (b) the preliminary estimate of the prospects of success in the appeal; (c) the costs that would be occasioned by requiring assessment of costs to proceed; and (d) the delay in notifying the fact of appeal; (2) Having regard to those factors, the execution of the costs order should not be stayed.
APPEAL — credibility findings — prospects of success — application for stay of execution of costs order — observations by Kirby P on the duty of lawyers to bring home to appellants the difficulties which adverse credibility findings present to the successful prosecution of an appeal.
Jones v Hyde (1989) 63 ALJR 349 (HC); Alexander & Ors v Cambridge Credit Corporation Ltd (Receivers Appointed) & Anor (1985) 2 NSWLR 685 (CA), applied.
Kirby P. It is a strange thing that disputes about procedural matters can sometimes present problems which are quite difficult, and the decision in which is evenly balanced. This is such a case. Indeed I feel that it is very evenly balanced even though the issues at stake are not particularly significant. The amount truly in issue is of the order of $2,000 to $3,500. But the case illustrates the quandary of decision-making because there are persuasive arguments on both sides.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate