NSW Caselaw
WILSON BROS TIMBER CARTAGE PTY LTD vy LLOYD
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
CLARKE JA 3 July 1995
[1995] NSWCA 519
Clarke JA. These are an application for expedition at the suit of the respondent to the appeal and an application for a stay by the appellant. The fundamental issue in the appeal is liability. I have had the issue described to me by counsel and although my reaction is that the appellant has a difficult task ahead of it, I am unable to say on what I have been told that the appeal has got no prospects, or no realistic prospects, of success. I tend to think that they might not be very great but I cannot say the appellant will not succeed.
Although the basic principle which is applied in actions in which the plaintiff receives a verdict is that the plaintiff is entitled to the fruits of that verdict, there has been a rule of practice for as long as I can remember in the type of case with which I am presently dealing that if liability is the issue on the appeal a stay should not be granted. That rule has not been applied invariably, particularly if some strong reason is shown for refusing a stay. The reason in this case is, according to the respondents argument, that the accident happened a long time ago. The difficulty with this argument is that the delay would seem to lie mainly at the feet of the respondent's earlier solicitors. In all the circumstances I think that the balancingexercise which should be carried out is weighted eventually in favour of the applicant for the stay.
Iam aware that her Honour declined to grant a stay after entering judgment but I have not seen a copy of her Honour's reasons for taking that action. In the circumstances, I do not think that there is anything in the evidence in this case to displace the rule of practice to which I adverted. Because there will be a stay and because of the length of time since the accident it is, however, appropriate that the proceedings be expedited and I grant expedition grade C. The costs of the application will be costs in the appeal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate