NSW Caselaw
YOUNG v MORTGAGE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
GLEESON CJ, KIRBY P and POWELL JA 20 March 1995
[1995] NSWCA 530
Gleeson CJ. This is an application for leave to appeal against what is acknowledged to be a discretionary judgment of Levine J in which he declined to set aside a judgment that had been entered as a result of earlier proceedings before Master Greenwood. I am not satisfied that it has been demonstrated that there was any relevant error of discretion on the part of Levine J. In particular, I am not persuaded that the point which it is said constituted an arguable, even though unpleaded, ground of defence is one of substance.
I would propose that the application for leave to appeal be refused and that the applicant should pay the respondent's costs of the application.
Kirby P. I agree. Powell JA. I also agree. Gleeson CJ. The application is refused.
Orders accordingly.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate