NSW Caselaw
CONTAINER TERMINALS OF AUSTRALIA LTD v FINNEY SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL MEAGHER, SHELLER and POWELL JJA
12 April 1995, 14 September 1995
[1995] NSWCA 93
Workers Compensation — Assessment and amount of compensation — Claim for weekly compensation and for lump sum awards pursuant to s66 and s67 — Incapacity resulting from injuries received before and after commencement of 1987 Act — Against whom award to be made.
Workers Compensation — Liability for — Successive employers — Worker suffering
successive injuries resulting in incapacity — Injuries received before and after commencement of 1987 Act — Sole liability of last employer — Claim for apportionment.
Workers Compensation — Assessment and amount of compensation — claim for weekly compensation and for lump sum awards pursuant to s66 and s67 — Incapacity resulting from injuries received before and after commencement of 1987 Act — Against whom award to be made.
Workers Compensation — Liability for — Successive employers — Worker suffering successive injuries resulting in incapacity — Injuries received before and after commencement of 1987 Act — Sole liability of last employer — Claim for Apportionment.
The First Respondent ("the worker") was, for a period of 12 years, or more, employed on the waterfront in the capacity of a tally clerk, the duties then expected to be performed by a tally clerk seemingly being far more extensive than used once to have been the case. During that period, the worker was employed, in succession by the Respondents, Liner, Conaust, and SEAL. and the
Appellant, CTAL. The worker's employment with Liner was all before 1987, that with Conaust partly before, and partly after the coming into force of the 1987 Act, that with SEAL between November 1991 and 1992, and that with CTAL from and after November 1992.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate