NSW Caselaw
SUKKAR v DAVIES
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
CLARKE JA, MEAGHER JA and HANDLEY JA 8 May 1995
[1995] NSWCA 461
Clarke JA. (On application to call fresh evidence.)
This is an application to the Court for the admission of fresh evidence, that is an undated certificate of Dr Fahed Succar from Lebanon. In it the doctor gives the results of an examination which he carried out on 1 August 1992.
In the evidence in support of the application there is material showing how the certificate comes to be in the hands of the solicitors for the appellant. There is, however, no explanation why the certificate was not obtained and tendered in the Court below. Nor is it suggested in the evidence that by the use of reasonable diligence the certificate could not have been obtained for use in the Court below. In these circumstances, where the Court is obliged by s 75A subsection 8 of the Supreme Court Act to find special grounds before admitting fresh evidence, it seems to me that the application must fail. There is a well established principle upon which the Court has as a matter of practice worked for years, that special grounds will not, in the absence of exceptional circumstances, be found where the evidence could have been available for use at the trial. In these circumstances, the application is rejected.
Orders accordingly.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate