NSW Caselaw
STEPANOVIC v GOVERNMENT INSURANCE OFFICE OF NEW SOUTH WALES
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
KIRBY P, PRIESTLEY JA 7 March 1995, 29 March 1995
[1995] NSWCA 454
DAMAGES — trespass — to the person — compensatory damages — aggravated damages — exemplary damages — plaintiff disbelieved — discount of 45% for contingencies — held: Allowance for duration of aggravation of back condition inadequate — discount excessive — damages recalculated.
DAMAGES — exemplary — aggravated — quantification of — deliberate act in causing motor cyclist to fall — allowances of $10,000.00 (aggravated) and $15,000.00 (exemplary) upheld.
DAMAGES — motor vehicle accident — deliberate wrongdoing — motor cycle driver recovers damages for trespass to the person — trial judge disbelieves his evidence — accepts previous existence of back disability — enters judgment in favour of plaintiff for $86,629.00 — appeal against inadequacy of judgment — whether appellate court entitled, in the face of credibility findings, to substitute its opinion for that of the trial judge — whether error shown in components of the damages judgment — held: (1) The Court of Appeal was bound to accept the credibility findings made by the primary judge; (2) However, in the determination of the duration of the consequences of aggravation of an established pre-existing back condition, the Court of Appeal was in the same position as the primary judge in making an informed estimate upon the basis of objective evidence; (3) In the objective evidence, the allowance by the primary judge of six months aggravation was inadequate and an allowance of two years should be made; (4) The refusal of the primary judge to allow as compensable an operation conducted more than two years after the accident should be sustained; (5) Consequent recalculation of past economic loss and general damages; (6) A discount of 45% for contingencies was excessive. Todorovic and Anor v Waller (1981) 150 CLR 402, applied; (7) The Court of Appeal should recalculate damages and substitute an amended judgment which should include interest on past economic loss.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate