NSW Caselaw
KRUF v MILLS
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
GLEESON CJ and ROLFE AJA 8 June 1995
[1995] NSWCA 251
ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES Appeal from decision from District Court judge assessing damages for personal injuries resulting from negligent driving of a motor vehicle - no error demonstrated - no question of principle involved.
Gleeson CJ This is an appeal from a decision of his Honour Judge Patten who, in proceedings in the District Court in February of this year, awarded the plaintiff damages in the amount of $86,827.63 for personal injuries resulting from negligence of the driver of a motor vehicle. His Honour assessed the respondent's damages at $91,397.50 but reduced that sum by 5 per cent to allow for a finding of contributory negligence.
The components of the damages as assessed were as follows. The respondent's non-economic loss was assessed at $65,100. That was based on an assessment of 30 per cent as the appropriate proportion of the maximum amount that could be awarded pursuant to s79(2) of the Motor Accidents Act. Second, out-of-pocket expenses were agreed at $6,596.30. Third, it was agreed that the plaintiffs economic loss amounted to $4,701.20. Fourth, as a cushion or buffer in relation to diminished earning capacity in the future the judge allowed $15,000.
This appeal is brought only in relation to the assessment of damages and it is the first and fourth of the amounts mentioned that are in contest.
The respondent was born on 28 October 1969. The motor vehicle accident the subject of the proceedings occurred on 26 November 1992. At the time the respondent was aged twenty-three. The respondent was a passenger in a motor vehicle driven by the first appellant which ran off the roadway. The people in the vehicle, including the appellant, had been drinking and that was the basis for the finding of contributory negligence.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate