LIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL v MINISTER FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND CO-OPERATIVES [1995] NSWCA 262
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
LIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL v MINISTER FOR LOCAL
GOVERNMENT AND CO-OPERATIVES
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
GLEESON CJ, KIRBY P and COLE JA
1, 17 February 1995
[1995] NSWCA 262
LOCAL GOVERNMENT — election of council — number of councillors —
computation of numbers — whether council has proposed to change the number of
councillors — held: It did. Council of the City of Newcastle vy The Minister for Local
Government and Co-operatives, Court of Appeal, unreported, February 1995
applied.
City of Newcastle Act 1986, s 7.
Local Government Act 1919, ss 23.
Local Government Act 1993, ss 25A, 222, 223, 224, 226, 227, schedule 7, cll 22,
26.
Gleeson CJ. This is a summons that was removed into the Court of Appeal by
order of Hunter J. It was heard together with the argument in the appeal in the
Council of the City of Newcastle v The Minister for Local Government and
Co-operatives.
The issue raised in the summons is substantially the same as that raised in the
appeal concerning the Council of the City of Newcastle, and senior counsel for
the plaintiff acknowledged that, if this court were to uphold the decision of
Windeyer J, the facts of the case are indistinguishable. The relevant facts are set
out in the affidavit of John Walker sworn 20 December 1994, paragraphs 1-8, and
are not in contest.
As with the Council of the City of Newcastle, the Liverpool City Council had,
prior to 1 July 1993, a popularly elected mayor who was also an alderman.
Similarly, the council made a determination under s 224(2)of the 1993 Act the
validity of which depended upon the same approach to the computation of
numbers as had been taken by the Council of the City of Newcastle.
For the reasons given in relation to the appeal concerning the Council of the
City of Newcastle, the summons should be dismissed with costs.
Kirby P. I agree with Gleeson CJ.
Cole JA. I agree with the Chief Justice.
Summons dismissed with costs.
Counsel for the plaintiff (liverpool council): J J Spigelman QC /T S Hale
Solicitors for the plaintiff (liverpool council): Michell Sillar
Counsel for the defendant: K Mason QC (Solicitor-General) / L Katz
Solicitors for the defendant: State Crown Solicitor's Office