NSW Caselaw
SHARP v STATE RAIL AUTHORITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
KIRBY P, SHELLER and COLE JJA 4 September 1995, 8 November 1995
[1995] NSWCA 422
LIMITATION OF ACTIONS — industrial deafness — where employee aware of the some of the causes of injury — other relevant acts and omissions of employer become evident on consultation with solicitor — breach of Australian standards — statement of claim filed out of time — whether time under s60G of Limitation Act 1969 should be extended — whether applicant unaware of connection between injury and respondent's elaborated acts and omissions — 601(1)(a)(iii) — held: (by maj) No extension.
Dedousis v The Water Board (1994) 181 CLR 171 applied.
WORDS AND PHRASES - "unaware of the connection between the personal injury and the defendant's act or omission".
LIMITATION OF ACTIONS - industrial deafness - application for extension of time - whether applicant unaware of connection between injury and defendant's act or omission - railway worker suffers hearing loss because exposed to loud telephones over extended period - formulated intention to sue but unable to raise funds - belated visit to solicitor - upon visit becomes aware of Australian Standards requiring employer tests for industrial deafness and preventive measures - whether plaintiff proved that he was unaware of the connection between the personal injury and the employer's relevant acts or omissions - held: (Cole JA, Sheller JA concurring; Kirby P dissenting) (affirming the order of HH Bell DCJ refusing to extend time): The plaintiff was aware of the connection between his hearing loss and the use of noisy telephones and of the existence of alternative systems - accordingly the provision of an extension of time under s60G of the Limitation Act 1969 was unavailable by reason of the terms of s60I of that Act.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate