NSW Caselaw
NEW SOUTH WALES INSURANCE MINISTERIAL CORPORATION v JONES
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
KirBy P, CoLe JA and ROLFE AJA 28 March, 4 April 1995 [1995] NSWCA 333
DAMAGES — motor vehicle accident — serving police officer injured in motor vehicle collision — common law entitlement — pre-accident and post-accident trauma — objective evidence of degeneration of the spine — whether, but for the subject motor vehicle accident, the degeneration would have caused incapacitating symptoms with economic consequences — whether incapacitating symptoms complained of were solely referable to the subject trauma or to pre-and post-accident trauma — primary judge (Barbour DCJ) allows plaintiff full undiscounted past financial loss — discounts future loss of economic capacity by 20% (ie 15% + 5%) — provides "cushion" for post-retirement economic loss of $30,000 — allows $100,000 for general damages — on appeal to the Court of Appeal against the judgment, allegedly excessive — held: (1) (by the Court): The judgment was excessive and authorised disturbance by the Court of Appeal; (2) (by the Court): The Court of Appeal could safely and properly substitute its own reassessment of the damages; (3) (Rolfe AJA, Cole JA concurring; Kirby P contra): The judgment sums should be reduced (a) as to past economic loss by an overall deduction of 15%; (b) as to future economic loss, by a deduction of 40%; (c) as to post-retirement cushion, by deletion of the item; and (d) by reduction of general damages to $70,000, all to take into account the possibility that pre-injury vulnerability of the spine would, even without the subject trauma, have caused disabilities and economic loss to the plaintiff.
Kirby P. The facts are set out in the judgment of Rolfe AJA.
In the District Court, Barbour DCJ found a verdict, and entered judgment, in favour of the respondent as follows:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate