NSW Caselaw
STATE RAIL AUTHORITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES v PAPWORTH
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
COLE JA, BEAZLEY JA and ABADEE AJA 27 November 1996
[1996] NSWCA 497
PART 9, rule 6, Workers Compensation Court Rules 1990 — operation and effect.
Cole JA. Two grounds only were argued on appeal subsequent to the filing by consent of an amended notice of appeal. The first ground was that the trial judge's finding that pre-accident earnings of $300 per week was unsupported by evidence. The second contention was that because there was admitted into evidence a schedule of earnings which showed pre-injury award earnings and actual earnings but left blank the column for comparable earnings and thus the net loss, the effect of Part 9, rule 6 Compensation Court Rules 1990 was to render the pre-injury employment award rates binding on the trial judge. In my judgment, each of those grounds fails.
Part 9 rule 6 provides:
In any application where the quantum of weekly compensation is or may be an issue and there is or may be a dispute in respect of the actual or probable earnings of a worker during any relevant period, the following provisions shall, unless the Court otherwise orders, have effect:
1. The applicant shall file and serve on each other party not later than twenty-one days before the hearing date a schedule containing full particulars of such earnings during such period.
2. If any party disputes the accuracy of any matter in the schedule, that party shall, not later than seven days after service file and serve a schedule containing its allegations of such earnings.
3. A matter not so disputed shall be deemed to be admitted.
There are a number of difficulties with the second proposition advanced on appeal. First, the exhibit which was tendered, exhibit N, did not have any information in it concerning comparable earnings or the difference being the loss. Accordingly, there is nothing to which Part 9 rule 6 can properly apply in relation to comparable earnings.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate