NSW Caselaw
SMITH v AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LTD SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
KirBY P, PRIESTLEY and SHELLER JJA 30 November 1995, 5 February 1996
MORTGAGES — "all moneys" clause — banker/customer mortgage — proper approach to construction — whether should be narrowly construed or according to terms — guidelines for construction — held: Clause to be construed according to its language which was deliberate, particular, not unfair and intentionally broad. BANKING AND BANKERS — security instruments — mortgage — "all moneys" clause — proper approach to construction- held: According to terms. CONTRACT — written contract mortgage- proper approach construction — "all moneys" clause. WORDS AND PHRASES — "all moneys".
MORTGAGES — "all moneys" clause — width of language of — proper approach to construction of — whether such clauses should be "read down" — whether such clauses should be given their ordinary ample meaning — suggested guidelines for construction of*all moneys" clauses in mortgages — held: (Priestley JA; Kirby P and Sheller JA concurring):
BANKS AND BANKING — security instruments — mortgages — "all moneys' clause — meaning of- proper approach to construction of — whether should be read down — whether to be given meaning according to ordinary denotation of the words used.
CONTRACT — construction — banker/customer — mortgage — "all moneys" clause.
WORDS and PHRASES — "all moneys".
(1) The primary duty of a court is to give effect to the meaning of an "all moneys" clause, as any other legal instrument, according to its terms, understood in the context.
Fountain v Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association (1992) 5 BPR 11817 (NSWCA) applied; Estoril Investments Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1993) 6 BPR 13146 (NSWSC); Re Modular Design Group Pty Limited (Receiver and Manager Appointed) (In Liq) (1994) 35 NSWLR 96 (SC); Bank of India v Transcontinental Commodity Merchants Limited [1982] QB 506; Catley Farms Limited v ANZ Banking Group [NZ] Ltd [1982] 1 NZLR 430 (HC) considered;
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate