STATEWIDE ROADS v HOLROYD CITY COUNCIL [1996] NSWCA 501
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
STATEWIDE ROADS v HOLROYD CITY COUNCIL
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
PRIESTLEY JA
1 July 1996
[1996] NSWCA 501
Priestley JA. The Council seeks a Suitors Fund Certificate. I indicated in
discussion with Mr O'Rourke that I thought it preferable that the application be
decided by the Bench that decided the appeal. With that in mind, and in the hope
of saving the time of the court and avoiding unnecessary expense, I make the
following directions:
qd)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
That the respondent council file with the associate to Mr Justice Clarke
by 4pm Friday 5 July 1996 three sets of written submissions supporting
the application for a Suitors Fund certificate.
The respondent council serve upon the appellant's solicitors and the
Crown solicitor by 4pm Tuesday 2 July 1996, a notice of these orders.
That should either the appellant or the Crown solicitor wish to make any
submission in opposition to the respondent's application, such
submission should be lodged in writing with the associate to Mr Justice
Clarke by 4pm on Friday 12 July 1996.
Any reply by the respondent council to be lodged in writing with the
associate to Mr Justice Clarke by 4pm Wednesday 17 July 1996.
Any further directions or decisions in this application to be made by a
court consisting of Mr Justice Clarke, Mr Justice Powell and Mr
JusticeCole, or such other court as Mr Justice Clarke may direct, with a
view to the court's decision being made without oral argument, unless
the court, after today, decides oral argument is expedient.
Costs of today to be costs in the application.
Orders accordingly.
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.