NSW Caselaw
GIO GENERAL LIMITED v MALATHOUNIS
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
PRIESTLEY AP and SHELLER JA 23 September 1996
[1996] NSWCA 214
Priestley AP. In view of the nature of the application and the fact that both the claimant and the opponent are agreed that the claimant has a right of appeal and is within time to file notice of appeal, it would seem that the only point of the summons being filed and brought before the Court was the reassurance the claimant wanted that it did indeed have a right of appeal.
In the circumstances the Court indicates its acceptance of the view of both parties that there is a right of appeal in the matter and thinks the appropriate order is that the summons be dismissed with costs.
Orders accordingly.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate