VICTOR JOHN FERGUSON v PAMELA STOTT [1996] NSWCA 183
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
VICTOR JOHN FERGUSON v PAMELA STOTT
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
GLEESON CJ and MEAGHER JA
11 March 1996
[1996] NSWCA 183
Gleeson CJ This is an application for an extension of time to seek leave to
appeal and for leave to appeal from a discretionary judgment of a District Court
judge involving an amount of about $10,000 and relating to a question of costs.
The brief reasons given by the learned judge for his discretionary decision in
relation to costs reveal no error of principle. The case raises no substantial
question of principle that requires determination by an appellate court and it
would be inappropriate to make an order that would have the effect of escalating
the costs that have already been devoted to this particular piece of litigation.
In my view there are insufficient prospects of success in the appeal to grant
either the extension of time or the leave to appeal. I propose that the application
for extension of time be dismissed with costs.
Meagher JA I agree.
Gleeson JA The order of the court will be that the application is dismissed
with costs
The order of the court will be that the application is dismissed with costs
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.