MOTOR ACCIDENT MUTUAL INSURANCE PTY LIMITED v KELLY [1996] NSWCA 372
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
MOTOR ACCIDENT MUTUAL INSURANCE PTY LIMITED v KELLY
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
SHELLER JA
11 March 1996
[1996] NSWCA 372
Sheller JA. This is the matter of Motor Accident Mutual Insurance Pty
Limited against Kelly. This is an application by an unsuccessful defendant which
has appealed for a stay of execution of the orders and judgment of his Honour
Judge Moore of 10 October 1995.
The successful plaintiff, Wayne Anthony Kelly, recovered damages arising out
of the loss of his car and a consequent claim he made on the defendant claimant
under a policy of insurance. The damages awarded by his Honour fell into the
following categories: $12,750 for the loss of the motor vehicle; $31,950 for two
years economic loss and $12,500 emotional distress, a total of some $57,000 to
which his Honour added interest to come up to the amount of the judgment of
$77,000.
I indicated during the course of argument that I thought this an appropriate
case in which to grant a stay subject to a condition that the claimant pay
someamount to the opponent. The amount that I suggested related to the damages
for the loss of the motor vehicle and interest thereon. I then invited the parties to
consider what would be an appropriate order. That has now been done and short
minutes of order signed by counsel have been filed in Court. The only remaining
question is the costs of this application. I think there is force in the claimant's
submission that it has succeeded in obtaining a stay, on the other hand it is only
obtained that on the basis of a condition which effectively was imposed by me.
In all the circumstances I think it appropriate that the costs of this application
should be costs in the appeal. Accordingly the orders I make are orders 1 and 2
in the short minutes of order signed by counsel, initialled by me and placed with
the papers. The costs of this application will be costs in the appeal.
Orders accordingly.