NSW Caselaw
DURKAN v COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA LTD
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
MAHONEY ACJ and PRIESTLEY AP 26 August 1996
[1996] NSWCA 161
Mahoney ACJ. This is an application for leave to appeal against a judgment of Mr Justice Abadee given on 1 July 1996 in matter number 11563/96 and, it may be, for an extension of time within which to bring that application.
The court is of the opinion that the application should not be granted and that it should be dismissed. It would follow that it should be dismissed with costs.
Ordinarily the court does not give reasons for the grant or refusal of leave to appeal applications. In general the reasons appear adequately in the dialogue which the court forces upon counsel who make applications of this kind. However, there are one or two matters in the present case which make it expedient that the court add some comments.
The property in question is, it would appear, the subject of two mortgages; one described as the business mortgage given in August 1986 and apparently registered number W533859 under the Real Property Act and the second described as the house mortgage given apparently in January 1991 and registered number Y828874.
The bank is proceeding in the instant proceeding in respect of the house mortgage. As the judge has said in his judgment it seeks no more than possession under the house mortgage. It is conceded that there has been default in respect of both of the mortgages. The defence which has been sought to be set up by Mr Colyer is — and I do not purport to cover all of the variations of the submissions that have been made by him — essentially a defence by way of equitable set-off.
It is claimed that, in the circumstances set forth on p 4 of the judge's judgment or some variation of what is there said, there has arisen a right in Mrs Durkan to have from Mr Kelly the receiver — and, if Mr Kelly was relevantly acting as agent for the bank from the bank — damages or compensation of some kind which she would hope she could set off against her liabilities to the bank.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate