Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
MULLER v NIXON
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
PRIESTLEY JA, HANDLEY JA and CoLe JA
9 April 1996
[1996] NSWCA 374
Priestley JA. The matter is one where a notice of appeal was filed which
raised questions of fact which had been decided by the Trial Judge after assessing
the credibility of both the plaintiff and the defendant below and finding in favour
of the plaintiff and against the defendant who became the appellant. The appeal
was thus an extremely unpromising one.
The solicitors for the appellant, after getting the matter to the stage of having
appeal books filed, filed notice of ceasing to act on 6 June 1994. A letter in the
file dated 27 September 1995 told the Registrar that the solicitor on the record
had ceased to act and he had no idea of the appellant's whereabouts.
It would thus seem that the appellant may not be aware of the matter being
listed for hearing today. That's a matter, so far as the Court records show, entirely
due to his own actions.
There is no reason why the case should be prolonged and the Court makes the
orders sought by the respondent that the appeal be dismissed with costs.
Orders accordingly.
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.