NSW Caselaw
WEST MERRIBEE PTY LTD v AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LTD
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
PRIESTLEY JA and SHELLER JA 23 September 1996
[1996] NSWCA 555
Priestley JA. The Court is of the view that leave should be refused in this matter. The only thing that needs to be added in light of the argument is that the Court's view is based on the facts, as they appear to be, that Master Malpass entered summary judgment in respect of the monetary claim and struck out the cross-claim. Dowd J did likewise, only he went a step further in that he made it plain that the order he was contemplating on the statement of claim not only went to the monetary order the Master had indicated, but also to an order entitling the plaintiff to judgment of possession.
The application for leave is refused with costs.
Orders accordingly.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate