LONG LEYS COMPANY PTY LIMITED v SILKDALE PTY LIMITED [1996] NSWCA 330
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
LONG LEYS COMPANY PTY LIMITED v SILKDALE PTY LIMITED
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
SHELLER JA
26 February 1996
[1996] NSWCA 330
Sheller JA. This is an application that time for the filing of a notice of grounds
of appeal be extended. It is supported by an affidavit from the applicant's solicitor
which indicates that judgment was given on 7 November 1995. Apparently on
that date notice of appeal without appointment was filed. Shortly thereafter the
solicitor received a letter from the Court of Appeal Registry which, amongst
other things, indicated that the file would be closed if a notice of appeal with
appointment was not filed by 25 March 1996.
Mr Burt, the solicitor, apparently read this as meaning that his client had until
that date within which to file a notice of appeal with appointment if it wished to
proceed with the appeal.
Mr Duncan, who appeared for the applicant, very fairly referred me to a
decision of Handley JA indicating that it is the responsibility of solicitors
tocalculate times within which steps should be taken to comply with the rules of
the Court. I would not wish to cast the slightest doubt on what was said by
Handley JA in that respect. However, this case does have some unusual features.
On 9 February 1996 — which was two days after the expiry of the time for filing
a notice of appeal of appointment — an attempt was made to file such a notice
which was then out of time.
Mr Burt in his affidavit has given reasons for late filing which turn upon his
unfortunate loss of a diary that he kept. This led him to make the mistake he did
as to the time for filing a notice of appeal. Unsuccessful parties in proceedings
such as these do have the right of appeal and, in my opinion, that right of appeal
should not be denied as a result of the unfortunate circumstances that occurred in
this case.
Mr Ryckmans, who appears for the opponent, submitted that there would be no
utility in the appeal for reasons which he gave. However, as I have said, but for
an unfortunate slip and a delay of two days the applicant would have been
entitled to appeal.
In my opinion this is an appropriate case in which to make the order sought.
I order that the time for filing a notice of appeal with appointment be extended
up to 4pm today. I order the claimant to pay the opponents costs of this
application.
Orders accordingly.
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.