HF [ANON] v THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES [1997] NSWCA 1
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
"HF" v THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
MASON P and COLE JA
8 December 1997
[1997] NSWCA 1
Mason P. This is a sad matter in which a father seeks leave to appeal from the
refusal of an adjournment and the consequential making of an order removing the
father as the tutor of his son.
The father was appointed tutor in a complex and difficult case. It is part-heard
and is to resume early in the new year.
Sperling J, who was not the trial judge, was presented with three affidavits by
the lawyers who are representing the plaintiff. In great detail those affidavits
deposed to a total breakdown of an effective working relationship between
solicitors and counsel and the tutor.
His Honour rejected an application for an adjournment notwithstanding that
the affidavits had only been served the night before.
Had I been shown material of substance which would have been relied upon
by the claimant that would have shown some miscarriage flowing from this
refused adjournment, then I might have had sympathy for the application for
leave so far as it is based upon the refusal of the adjournment. His Honour did
offer the claimant the opportunity to give oral evidence but that opportunity was
declined. On the substantive point we were taken to the passage in Dey v
Victorian Railway Commissioners 78 CLR 62 at 113 which emphasises the prima
facie strong claim of a father to be appointed the tutor of his child for litigation.
The passage also indicates that the court's power to remove that tutor may be
exercised if for any reason the court considers that the infant's interests will not
be properly protected by the tutor. This is a very broad discretionary judgment.
It emphasises the primacy of the litigant's interests over the tutor's and, having
regard to that principle and the material that was before Sperling J, I do not
consider that the application for leave has any prospect of success.
I would therefore propose leave be refused.
Cole JA. I agree.
Mason P. The summons is dismissed with costs.
Orders accordingly.
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.