Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
WENTWORTH v ROGERS
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
BEAZLEY JA and CLARKE AJA
21 April 1997
[1997] NSWCA 338
Beazley JA. (ON APPLICATION FOR DISQUALIFICATION)
Miss Wentworth has made an application that I disqualify myself from hearing
this matter.
She relies upon a matter in which I was senior counsel in 1992 called NAB v
Benecke in which I was briefed on behalf of Mrs Benecke. Miss Wentworth was
not a party to those proceedings nor was she a witness. I never met her during the
course of those proceedings nor have I ever met her.
The issues in that case have nothing to do with the issues in this case. That
matter settled and some time after the settlement Mrs Benecke made application
to have the settlement set aside. That matter was the subject of a full hearing
before Justice Giles in the Commercial Division and the matter was determined
by his Honour. It is my recollection, although I did not follow the litigation in
detail, that the matter was also the subject of an appeal to this Court and that
appeal was also dismissed.
Miss Wentworth has referred the Court to a number of cases dealing with the
principles upon which a judge should act in determining whether or not to
disqualify herself or himself from hearing a matter. In particular she made
reference to Australian National Industries Limited v Spedley Securities Limited
(1992) 26 NSWLR 411. She submitted, in accordance with the principles
enunciated in that case that, as she has a reasonable apprehension of lack of
impartiality on my part, I should disqualify myself.
Ihave reviewed that case carefully as Miss Wentworth took the Court through
it and do not consider that there is any matter raised in that judgment nor any
factual matter upon which she based her application that would cause me to
disqualify myself. In particular, it appears that she relies upon her assertion that
I would be biased in a legal sense such that if I rejected her application I would
thereby demonstrate that I had adversely dealt with her credit. I do not consider
that Australian National Industries v Spedley Securities supports that proposition
nor do I consider any of the other cases which have dealt with the principles
governing bias by a judicial officer require me to disqualify myself on that basis.
Miss Wentworth further raised the fact of my marriage to a member of the New
South Wales Bar Association but I do not consider that requires me to disqualify
myself.
Finally she referred in a more embracing submission to her apprehension that
there would be no member of this Court who would be able to sit on her case or
her cases having regard to the principles specified in the Spedley case. It is
neither possible nor appropriate for me to rule upon that application and in
rejecting her application I do so only upon the basis of the matters which were
directed specifically at my own sitting on the matter.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed.
Orders accordingly.
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.