NSW Caselaw
JAMES HARDY & CO PTY LTD v THE ELECTRICITY COMMISSION OF NEW SOUTH WALES (t/a PACIFIC POWER) and ANOR
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
POWELL and COLE JJA 20 October 1997
[1997] NSWCA 166
Powell JA The Court has considered the submissions which Mr Douglas has advanced on behalf of the Claimant and while it recognises that the hearing which was contemplated earlier will now not take place at as early a date as was once thought, it nonetheless remains of the view expressed by Mason P in the Judgment which he delivered on behalf of himself and Cole JA on 24 February of this year and does not consider it appropriate to vacate the order which was made on that occasion.
The Court is of the opinion that the costs of today should be costs in the application.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate