NSW Caselaw
HEMMING v MALECKI SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
SHELLER and STEIN JJA 10 November 1997
[1997] NSWCA 144 Sheller JA
Summons
This application for leave to appeal was limited during argument to the question involved in paral2 of the summons. The question raised by paral1 was not pressed.
The Court is not persuaded that there was any error in the way in which the trial Judge exercised his discretion in making the order for costs that are complained about.
Accordingly, the application is refused with costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate