NSW Caselaw
COLLIER v SENGOS
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
REGISTRAR Jupp 10 February 1997
[1997] NSWCA 68
Registrar Jupp. In the matter of Collier v Sengos, Mr Stone has appeared on behalf of the respondent, the claimant to one motion and opponent to another motion which have been filed and are both returnable today.
Ms Collier, who is the daughter of the appellants, has appeared at 11.15 am, which is the second time that the matter has been called and has advised me that Mrs Collier has been delayed.
Mr Stone has sought an adjournment of the motion and in this regard I note that the Notice of Motion filed by the Colliers was filed with the registry on 7 February 1997 and time for service for that motion was abridged.
Mr Stone has indicated that he is not in a position to deal with that motion today and would be seeking and adjournment in any event.
It is now 11.15 am and the matter was originally listed at 9.45. I think under those circumstances the appropriate thing to do is to allow Mr Stone's application for an adjournment, which will finalise the matter for today. I will adjourn the motions to Monday 10 March, 1997 at 9.45.
The costs of today are reserved.
Orders accordingly.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate