NSW Caselaw
VALASSIS v SOUTH SYDNEY CITY COUNCIL SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
HANDLEY JA and BEAZLEY JA 24 February 1997
[1997] NSWCA 327
Handley JA. This is an application by Mr Valassis appearing in person for leave to appeal from a decision of Stein J on 19 September 1996 in the Land and Environment Court.
The proceedings before Stein J involved an application by South Sydney City Council for an order under s 70 (2) of the Land and Environment Court Act for a declaration that Mr Valassis was a vexatious litigant and for orders restraining him from instituting any legal proceedings in that Court against the Council without the leave of the Court.
Stein J, for reasons which he gave, made orders as sought by the Council. Mr Valassis did not either appeal or seek leave to appeal within the necessary time but made an application to Stein J either for leave to proceed with his pending appeal in the Land and Environment Court, or forreconsideration of the decision of 19 September, that notice of motion filed on 4 October was dismissed on 28 October. Mr Valassis has not sought leave to appeal from the second decision of Stein J.
The present summons raises a question as to the powers of this Court to entertain appeals from decisions of the Land and Environment Court under s 70 of its Act declaring or refusing to declare a litigant vexatious. Pt 3 of the Land and Environment Court Act defines the jurisdiction of the Court and divides that jurisdiction into six classes, each of which is elaborately defined and described.
Proceedings under s 70 of the Land and Environment Court Act do not appear to fall within any of these classes of the Court's jurisdiction. Of course the proceeding which led the Council to initiate its application under s 70 was an appeal to the Court in Class 1 of its jurisdiction against the refusal of the South Sydney Council to grant development consent on an application made by Mr Valassis relating to his premises at 304A Chalmers Street, Redfern.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate