NSW Caselaw
YI GANG YING v PETER J DOYLE PTY LTD
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
MASON P, MEAGHER JA and GROVE AJA 2 May 1997
[1997] NSWCA 352
WORKERS COMPENSATION — periodic journey — motor traffic accident — dangerous behaviour of worker's vehicle — inference of fault in part or whole for injury — rejection by trial judge of suggested alternative causes
The appellant was driving home from work upon a six lane freeway by-pass. The road was wet. His car moved across an adjacent traffic lane, a median strip, two oncoming traffic lanes and collided with another car approaching in a third lane. At the time a worker on a periodic journey was disentitled to compensation if injury was caused wholly or partly by his own fault. The trial judge inferred fault from the circumstances of the behaviour of the appellant's car. He rejected arguments asserting that the accident might have been caused by factors other than the appellant's fault.
Held: No error by the trial judge has been demonstrated and his findings should not be disturbed.
Mason P I agree with Grove AJA. Meagher JA I agree with Grove AJA
Grove AJA This is an appeal by an applicant worker against an award by Burke CCJ in favour of the respondent given on 16 August 1996. Matters of common ground can be mentioned. First, the appellant sustained relevant injury on a periodic journey between his places of employment and abode shortly after 10.30 pm on 28 April 1993; second, that the respondent employer bore the onus of demonstrating (if it could) that the injury was wholly or partly the fault of the appellant and thereby disentitled him to benefit under the Workers Compensation Act 1987 and, third, that this appeal is not limited exclusively to error of law. The appellant left work driving a Mitsubishi motor car which he had purchased from a cousin shortly beforehand and at some time after certain repairs were made to it in about December 1992. I shall refer later to those repairs. The appellant was the driver and sole occupant of the car. He travelled west in Sydney Einfeld Drive, Bondi Junction which was described as a six lane freeway by-pass. Whilst negotiating a slow left curve the car moved to its right from the middle westbound lane and crossed in turn the adjacent lane, the median strip, two lanes allocated for eastbound traffic and then collided with a vehicle being driven by a Mrs Fraser in the third or northernmost eastbound lane. The appellant asserted that it was raining heavily at the time of the accident whereas Mrs Fraser said it was not raining at all. It was accepted that the roadway was wet.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate