KLEWER v THE DISTRICT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES [1997] NSWCA 178
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
KLEWER v THE DISTRICT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
MEAGHER JA, BEAZLEY JA and BROWNIE AJA
5 March 1997
[1997] NSWCA 178
Meagher JA. In this matter the Court is dealing with an application by Mrs
Klewer against the District Court, and in particular his Honour Judge Johnson.
The history of the matter is this, that Mrs Klewer was involved in an
altercation with a Mr Andrew Roland Martin — who is a police officer — on 18
March 1994. Mrs Klewer sued Mr Martin in the Local Court and that matter was
heard on 22 June 1995. She failed in that case and costs were awarded against
her. The amount of costs was $4,500.
She then appealed to the District Court, held in Coffs Harbour, and only on the
question of costs. She lost that appeal and incurred further costs in that appeal.
The amount of the additional costs was $500, as a result of which Mrs Klewer
now owes $5,000 by way of costs, aggregating the two orders of the Local Court
and the District Court.
Her application to this Court is an application by way of prerogative relief,
presumably for orders in the nature of certiorari. The only material before the
Court to which we can have regard, taking her case even at itshighest, is her
affidavit and the judgment of his Honour Judge Johnson, and perhaps the
transcript. On recent judicial authorities we may not even be able to have regard
to some of that, but in any event it is fairly clear that from the documents before
the Court there is no case proved of error of law. There is no case proved of
breach of natural justice. There is no case proved of procedural unfairness. And
the unfortunate fact must be that the summons should be dismissed.
I come to that conclusion with some reluctance because one cannot help
having sympathy for Mrs Klewer, who has seven children, is on a single
mothers" pension, and has very limited financial means, and in general is far
from being sufficiently prosperous to handle these matters so that they do not hurt
her. But unfortunately, however badly off she is personally, there is nothing we
can do to help her in that regard.
The most we could do is ask the second opponent, Mr Martin, to be as
charitable as he can be in enforcing his rights against her. That, unfortunately, is
only a request and not an order.
The summons is therefore dismissed.
Beazley JA. I agree.
Brownie AJA. I agree.
COX: I am instructed to seek an order for costs.
Meagher JA. If you are instructed to, you must have them.
Orders accordingly.
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.