NSW Caselaw
NESTLE AUSTRALIA LTD v McDOUGALL
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
MASON P, POWELL and BEAZLEY JJA 20 April 1998, 24 June 1998
[1998] NSWCA 158
Damages — Personal injury — Deduction for vicissitudes from award for past economic loss or general damages — Where pre-existing medical condition — Usual deduction for contingencies — Whether other discount figure should be applied — Positive and adverse contingencies — Whether vicissitude of non-tortious injury should be taken into account
Practice and procedure — Pleadings and particulars — Failure to particularise — Purpose of particulars — Where evidence to support claim — Absence of prejudice — Supreme Court Rules Pt33 r8A.
This is an appeal from an award of damages made by Badgery-Parker J in favour of the respondent for personal injuries sustained on 10 April 1987. Four principal issues arose on the appeal:
(i) whether the trial judge should have made a deduction for vicissitudes from the amount awarded for past economic loss. There was also a challenge to the award of economic loss for the period to September/October 1991;
(ii) whether such deduction should also have been made from the award for general damages;
(iii) whether his Honour wrongly excluded the potentiality of non-tortious work-related injuries from the assessment of the percentage deduction made for vicissitudes; and (iv) whether the trial judge erred in permitting any claim for future out-of-pocket expenses when such claims, although notified in a general sense, had not been particularised.
HELD, dismissing the appeal:
(1) In an award of damages for future economic loss, account must be taken of the vicissitudes which may affect a particular plaintiff's earning capacity. Account must be taken of both positive and adverse contingencies in assessing the appropriate award of damages, including the possibility of future non-tortious injury, as well as the possible development or deterioration of any pre-existing injury or condition.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate