PATRICK STEVEDORES NO 1 LTD T/AS PATRICK THE AUSTRALIAN STEVEDORES v DIVERS [1998] NSWCA 170
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
PATRICK STEVEDORES NO 1 LTD T/AS PATRICK THE AUSTRALIAN
STEVEDORES v DIVERS
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
HANDLEY, COLE and STEIN JJA
1 April 1998
[1998] NSWCA 170
Handley JA This is an appeal by Patrick Stevedores No | Ltd in the interest
of QBE Workers Compensation (New South Wales) Ltd from awards made by
Burke CCJ in favour of the worker. The only grounds of appeal sought to be
pursued are grounds relating to the apportionment of the appellant's liability to
the worker against earlier insurers or employers. However these earlier insurers
and employers, whoever they may be, have not been joined in the proceedings
and are not parties to this appeal.
S22(7) of the Workers Compensation Act makes it plain that apportionment
under that section is not a matter which is to directly affect compensation payable
to the worker. This view is reinforced by the provisions of s22A(4) and s22A(5)
which relate to the working out of apportionment orders among various
employers and insurers.
Since the only party before the Court as a respondent cannot be affected
directly by an order of apportionment at this stage of the proceedings, and since
the other parties who might be affected by such an order, if it were to be made,
were not joined in the Compensation Court and are not parties to the appeal, this
Court simply cannot consider the apportionment issues which this appellant
seeks to raise.
In those circumstances I am of the view that the appeal fails for want of
necessary parties and should be dismissed with costs.
Cole JA I agree.
Stein JA I also agree.
Handley JA The order of the Court is appeal dismissed with costs.
The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.