TYNAN v MEHARG & NEWCASTLE CITY COUNCIL [1998] NSWCA 241
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
TYNAN v MEHARG & NEWCASTLE CITY COUNCIL
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
PRIESTLEY JA, HANDLEY JA and STEIN JA
21 December 1998
[1998] NSWCA 241
Priestley JA. The court has come to the conclusion that the materials before
it clearly establish, and establish beyond reasonable doubt, that the opponents are
guilty of wilful contempt and in due course the court will make a declaration
accordingly. That declaration will not be made in a formal sense today.
The formal orders and declarations will be made at the same time as the court
announces its decision on what the appropriate orders should be to ensure the
enforcement of the court's order and the dealing with the wilful contempt that it
is opinion has taken place.
In order to determine what are the appropriate orders to be made in addition
to the findings concerning wilful contempt the court proposes toadjourn the
proceedings until 15 February 1999 at 9.30 am. At that time the court will
consider whatever evidence has been put before the court in addition to what is
presently before it. That further evidence will relate to the appropriate orders to
be made by way of penalty or other appropriate order to deal with the situation.
So far as the claimant's side of the proceedings is concerned, there has been
reference in correspondence and in court to the availability of Pt 42 r 9, a source
of power pursuant to which the court upon proper application can order the doing
of actions, such as the demolition of the building in this case by some person
other than the person in contempt. If the claimant has any intention to apply for
an order under Pt 42 r 9 then all relevant materials should be before the court on
the next occasion.
On the part of the opponents, there has been reference today to a development
application, which we were told today was intended originally to be filed today.
In view of the way time has been taken up by the proceedings the court does not
imagine that that development application will have been lodged by the end of
today but has been proceeding on the basis that it will be filed and will be filed
this week.
Orders accordingly.
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.