NSW Caselaw
ALGONS ENGINEERING PTY LTD v MATOS SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES — COURT OF APPEAL
MASON P, SHELLER JA and POWELL JA 16 September 1998
[1998] NSWCA 11
Mason P, Sheller JA and Powell JA. SHORT REASONS FOR DECISION
The appeal is dismissed and the Court is of the unanimous opinion that the appeal does not raise any question of general principle. Pursuant to section 45(4) of the Supreme Court Act 1970, the Court's reasons for decision in short form are:
It is doubtful that the appellant's complaint is 'in point of law' as required by s 32(1) of the Compensation Court Act 1984. Be that as it may, the facts as found amply supported the conclusion that travelling from Largs to Islington to pick up pay was a reasonable incident of the respondent's employment. This was pay day and Islington was the pay office of the appellant. The reasoning of Truss CCJ reveals no error.
Orders accordingly.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate