NSW Caselaw
AMALGAMATED TELEVISION SERVICES PTY LTD v MARSDEN SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
PRIESTLEY and POWELL JJA 6 July 1998
[1998] NSWCA 13
Priestley JA The application before the Court is by the defendant in defamation proceedings, which have had a fairly lengthy interlocutory history, a fate to which defamation proceedings in this State seem to be doomed, notwithstanding the constant criticism by this court of the length of time the interlocutory matters take.
In this particular instance, the matters which have been argued this morning on behalf of the claimant defendant were dealt with in detail by his Honour Justice Levine.
The Court sees no need to do any more in relation to the application than to say that it sees no error in the conclusion at which Levine J arrived, nor in the general reasoning by which he arrived at those conclusions.
Some matters in respect of which this Court might express a little differently the form of some of the reasons given by Levine J have been fairly fully explored in argument, and need not be repeated in these reasons.
In substance, as I have already indicated, the Court agrees with the reasons and conclusions of Levine J.
One further matter to mention is that, in arriving at this conclusion, some consideration was given to the full paragraph which appears on p9 of Levine J's reasons. The opening sentence in that paragraph, standing alone, might cause some difficulty in its use of the words "teenage boys". However, that difficulty disappears if a defining sentence which occurs later in the paragraph is accepted as correct.
In the course of the argument today it became clear that both plaintiff and defendant were content to accept what I have called the defining sentence as a correct one, and as setting out the basis upon which argument proceeded before Levine J in regard to imputations involving the use of the words "teenage boys".
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate