Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
CIC WORKERS COMPENSATION (NSW) LID v KELLOGG
(AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
PRIESTLEY, MEAGHER and BEAZLEY JJA
23 July and 5 September 1996, 30 July 1998
[1998] NSWCA 59
Priestley, Meagher And Beazley JJA When judgment dismissing this appeal
was delivered no costs orders were made, for reasons then given. It was ordered
that any party wishing to make submissions about costs should file a written note
of its arguments within fourteen days.
Some, but not all, of the parties afterwards filed notes of their arguments on
costs accordingly. Amongst the submissions filed, those of the second respondent
(NEM), dated 5 December 1996, were the fullest. In the court's opinion they
were also generally accurate and sound. The court therefore adopts them, and
makes the costs order contended for by NEM: The Appellant is to pay the costs
of the Respondents of the Appeal and of the cross-claim before his Honour Judge
Johns.
Appellant to pay the costs of the respondents of the Appeal and of the
cross-claim.
Counsel for the appellant: J D Hislop QC D Parker
Solicitors for the appellant: P V Mccullock & Buggy
Counsel for the respondent: (2) J West SC/MS D G Stewart
Solicitors for the respondent: (2) Hunt & Hunt
Counsel for the respondent: (3)C Hoesen
Solicitors for the respondent: (3) Landerer & Co
Counsel for the respondent: (4) M Cranitch SC
Solicitors for the respondent: (4) Sparke Helmore
Counsel for the respondent: (5) G R Petty
Solicitors for the respondent: (5) A R Ellison
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.