NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 162 A Crim R 152
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: TAUFAHEMA v THE QUEEN [2006] NSWCCA 152 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 28/02/06
JUDGMENT DATE: 8 May 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Beazley JA at 1; Adams J at 2; Howie J at 41
DECISION: Conviction quashed; verdict of acquittal entered
CATCHWORDS: Conviction appeal - murder - joint criminal enterprise - mere knowledge of other's intention insufficient if no agreement - nature of enterprise - necessity for underlying criminal offence - whether evading police "hindering" - manslaughter - necessary to foresee possibility that accomplice might murder the victim - mere advertance to possibility of death or grievious bodily harm insufficient
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 ss 546C, 33B, 58
Gillard v The Queen (2003) 219 CLR 1 Leonard v Morris (1975) 10 SASR 528 McAuliffe v The Queen (1995) 183 CLR 108 CASES CITED: R v Chekeri [2001] NSWCCA 221 R v Kanaan [2005] NSWCCA 385 Tangye (1997) 92 A Crim R 545 Worsley v Aitken & Anor (1990) 9 Petty Sessions Review 4074
Motekiai 'Oscar' TAUFAHEMA (Appellant) PARTIES: v
The Queen (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2005/2120
COUNSEL: Appellant: T. Game SC Crown: J. Bennett SC
SOLICITORS: Appellant: S.O'Connor Crown: S. Kavanagh
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 2002/107
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Sully J
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 22/03/2004
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate