Irresistible Frocks Salon Pty Ltd v Sparbac Pty Ltd and Roche Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2004] NSWADT 72

CITATION: Irresistible Frocks Salon Pty Ltd v Sparbac Pty Ltd and Roche Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2004] NSWADT 72 DIVISION: Retail Leases Division APPLICANT Irresistable Frocks Salon Pty Ltd PARTIES: FIRST RESPONDENT Sparbac Pty Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT Roche Group Pty Ltd FILE NUMBER: 035060, 035103 HEARING DATES: 23/03/2004 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 03/23/2004 DATE OF DECISION: 04/15/2004

BEFORE: Chesterman M - ADCJ (Deputy President); Fagg N - Member; Griffiths G - Member APPLICATION: Costs MATTER FOR DECISION: Costs LEGISLATION CITED : Retail Leases Act 1994 Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 Alessa Pty Ltd v Total & Universal Pty Ltd [2001] NSWADT 150 Arkbay Investments Pty Ltd v Habib & Ozvic Enterprises Pty Ltd [2003] NSWADT 143 Barsoum v Glebe Administration Board (No. 2) [2002] NSWADT 174 Brooks Maher v Cheung [2001] NSWADT 18 Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 CASES CITED: Gizah Pty Ltd v AXA Trustees Ltd (No. 2) [2001] NSWADT 164 Irresistible Frocks Salon Pty Ltd v Sparbac Pty Ltd and Roche Group Pty Ltd [2003] NSWADT 241 Jones v Bradley (No. 2) [2003] NSWCA 258 Nobrega v Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Archdiocese of Sydney (No. 2) [1999] NSWCA 133 Randi Wiks Pty Ltd v Pokana Pty Ltd [2003] NSWADTAP 27 Wood & Anor v Bergman (No. 2) [2003] NSWADT 175 APPLICANT R Titterton, barrister REPRESENTATION: FIRST RESPONDENT No appearance SECOND RESPONDENT R Angyal, barrister ORDERS: 1. The Applicant's application for costs against the First Respondent is dismissed.; 2. The Second Respondent is to pay the Applicant's costs on a party-party basis.