NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Collier v Sunol [2005] NSWADT 261 DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division APPLICANT PARTIES: Henry Collier RESPONDENT John Sunol FILE NUMBER: 051037 HEARING DATES: 28/09/2005 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 28/09/2005 DATE OF DECISION: 17/11/2005
BEFORE: Chesterman M - ADCJ (Deputy President); Gill M - Non Judicial Member; Groth D - Non Judicial Member APPLICATION: Vilification - Homosexual MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter LEGISLATION CITED : Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) Burns v Dye [2002] NSWADT 32 Burns v Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd & Ors [2004] NSWADT 267 Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick [2002] HCA 56 Harou-Sourdon v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd [1994] EOC 92-604 Inquiry Into Broadcasts by Ron Casey (1989) 3 BR 351 CASES CITED: John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Kazak (EOD) [2002] NSWADTAP 35 Kazak v John Fairfax Publications Limited [2000] NSWADT 77 Jones v Toben [2002] FCA 1150 Veloskey & Anor v Karagiannakis & Ors (EOD) [2002] NSWADTAP 18 Wagga Wagga Aboriginal Action Group v Eldridge [1995] EOC 92-701 Western Aboriginal Legal Service Limited v Jones & Anor [2000] NSWADT 102 APPLICANT REPRESENTATION: S Pritchard, barrister RESPONDENT In person ORDERS: 1. The Application is upheld in relation to the following statements set out in paragraph 2.3 of the Points of Claim as amended: (d), (e), (f), (h) and (i); 2. The parties are to address us on the matter of what orders we should make by way of relief and with regard to costs. We direct the Registry to arrange a hearing for this purpose
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate