NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Peric v Director General, Department of Transport [2001] NSWADT 22 DIVISION: General Division APPLICANT PARTIES: Miladin Peric RESPONDENT Director General, Department of Transport FILE NUMBER: 003385 HEARING DATES: 09/01/01 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 01/09/2001 DATE OF DECISION: 02/14/2001
BEFORE: Fleming G - Judicial Member APPLICATION: Passenger Transport Act - private hire vehicle driver - grant of authority - Passenger Transport Act - taxi driver - cancellation of authority - Private hire vehicle driver - grant of authority - Taxi driver - cancellation of authority MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter LEGISLATION CITED : Passenger Transport Act 1990 CASES CITED: APPLICANT REPRESENTATION: In person RESPONDENT A Wozniak, solicitor ORDERS: 1. The Tribunal affirms the decisions under review to refuse to grant Miladin Peric a license to drive a private hire vehicle and to cancel his licence to drive a public passenger vehicle
The Application
1 On 14 November 2000 the Director General, Department of Transport (the Director General) cancelled Miladin Peric's authorities to drive taxi-cabs and made a decision to refuse to grant him a licence to drive hire cars. The Director General's reasons for these decisions were that "Your proven offence record indicates that you [Mr Peric] can no longer be considered a person of good repute and in all respects a fit and proper person to drive a public passenger vehicle".
The Relevant Law
2 Under s 52(1) of the Passenger Transport Act 1990 ('the Act'), a person whose application has been refused or whose accreditation or authority has been varied, suspended or cancelled, may apply to the Administrative Decisions Tribunal for a review of that decision. 3 Section 14 of the Act gives the Director General power to vary, suspend or cancel any person's authority. That section states that. . "having regard to the purpose of an authority, the Director-General may at any time vary, suspend or cancel any person's authority". 4 The purpose of an authority is set out in s 11(2): The purpose of an authority under this Division is to attest: (a) that the authorised person is considered to be of good repute and in all other respects a fit and proper person to be the driver of a public passenger vehicle; and (b) that the authorised person is considered to have sufficient responsibility and aptitude to drive the vehicle or vehicles to which the authority relates: (i) in accordance with the conditions under which a public passenger service is operated; and (ii) in accordance with law and custom. 5 The issue in this case is whether the Director General made the correct and preferable decision in cancelling the applicant's taxi authority and refusing to grant an authority to drive a hire car.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate