NSW Caselaw
Appeal Panel - Internal
CITATION: (1) Prasad and Walker -v- Fairfield City Council; (2) Fairfield City Council -v- Prasad and Walker [2003] NSWADTAP 1 APPELLANTS (1) Daniel Prasad and Stephen Walker PARTIES: (2) Fairfield City Council RESPONDENTS (1) Fairfield City Council (2) Daniel Prasad and Stephen Walker FILE NUMBER: (1) 029024; (2) 029033 HEARING DATES: 08/08/2002 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 08/08/2002 DATE OF DECISION: 08/08/2002
Prasad and Anor -v- Fairfield City Council [2001] NSWADT DECISION UNDER APPEAL: BEFORE: O'Connor K - DCJ (President); Donald BG - Judicial Member; O'Neill A - Member CATCHWORDS: costs MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter FILE NUMBER UNDER APPEAL: 005020 DATE OF DECISION UNDER APPEAL: 05/02/2002 LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Retail Leases Act 1994 Prasad and anor v Fairfield City Council [2002] NSWADTAP 2 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 CASES CITED: Woodside & anor v Director-General, Department of Community Services [2000] NSWADTAP 8 House -v- The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Citadin Pty Ltd -v- Eddie Azzi Australia & anor (No. 2) [2001] NSWADTAP 31 Alessa Pty Ltd -v- Total & Universal Pty Ltd [2001] NSWADT 150; on appeal [2002] NSWADTAP 16 APPELLANTS (1) L Steer, solicitor REPRESENTATION: (2) M Jenkins, barrister RESPONDENTS (1) M Jenkins, barrister (2) L Steer, solicitor ORDERS: Both appeals as to costs are dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate