NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Egan v de Goede [2003] NSWADT 18 DIVISION: Retail Leases Division APPLICANT PARTIES: Timothy Egan RESPONDENT Gerhard (Peter) de Goede and Suzanne de Goede FILE NUMBER: 025065 HEARING DATES: 02/09/2002 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 09/02/2002 DATE OF DECISION: 01/29/2003
BEFORE: Montgomery S - Judicial Member APPLICATION: Claim for payment of money MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 LEGISLATION CITED : Retail Leases Act 1994 Legal Profession Act 1987 Worsfold -v- de Goede [2002] NSWADT 273 Aspromonte Pty. Limited v Zagari (1999) NSWSC 831 Shevill v The Builders Licensing Board (1982) 149 CLR 620 at 626 Alessa Pty Limited -v- Total & Universal Pty Limited [2001] NSWADT 150 Townsend v SRA [1999] NSWADT 104 CASES CITED: Citadin Pty Ltd v Eddie Azzi Australia Pty Ltd & anor (No 2)[2001] NSWADTAP31 Holpitt Pty Ltd v Varimu Pty Ltd (1991) 103 ALR 684 Hoblos v Marchese [1999] NSW ADT 127 Fonua v BHP Co. Ltd [1999] NSW ADT 59 Langley v UNSW (1984) EOC 92-018 at 75 468 Henry v Henry 135 ALR 564 at 576 Citadin Pty Ltd v. Eddie Azzi Australia Pty Ltd & Anor [2001] NSWADT 31 APPLICANT REPRESENTATION: T Egan, in person RESPONDENT P de Goede, in person and agent ORDERS: Mr Gerhard de Goede and Ms Suzanne de Goede are to pay to Mr Timothy Egan the amount of $10,878.98. This amount is to be paid within 21 days of these orders.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate