NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Ravel v Plastral Fidene Pty Ltd [1999] NSWADT 18
DIVISION: Equal Opportunity
APPLICANT: Ravel
RESPONDENT: Plastral Fidene Pty Ltd
FILE NUMBER: 77 of 1998
HEARING DATES: 02/12/1999
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 02/12/1999
DATE OF DECISION: 12 February 1999
G Innes AM - Judicial Member BEFORE: S Bullock - Member L Taksa - Member
PRIMARY LEGISLATION: Anti Discrimination Act 1977
APPLICATION: Race Discrimination - Employment - Race Discrimination against a contract worker
MATTER FOR DECISION: S 111 Application
Applicant: In person REPRESENTATION: Respondent: P Hanna of Counsel instructed by Tress Cocks & Maddox Solicitors
ORDERS: 1. Complaint be dismissed. 2. No order as to cost.
INTRODUCTION 1 On 9 December 1997, Ms Rosalind Ravel lodged a complaint with the New South Wales Anti-Discrimination Board alleging that she had been discriminated against on the ground of her race, in breach of ss 7 and 10 of the New South Wales Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 as amended, the Act. The complaint was lodged against Plastral Fidene Pty Limited, and alleged that employees of that company had used racist epithets towards the complainant during her period of contract work with the company in mid-1987.
2 The President of the Board investigated the complaint, and declined it as lacking in substance under s 90(1) of the Act on 5 May 1998. The complainant chose, as is her right under s 91(1) to have the matter referred to the Equal Opportunity Tribunal for hearing on 20 May 1998.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate