NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Law Society of New South Wales v Waterhouse [2002] NSWADT 204 DIVISION: Legal Services Division APPLICANT PARTIES: Council of the Law Society of New South Wales RESPONDENT Martin Otto Waterhouse FILE NUMBER: 012023 HEARING DATES: 11/07/02, 26/08/02 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 08/26/2002 DATE OF DECISION: 10/18/2002
BEFORE: Macfarlan R QC - Judicial Member; Hale S - Judicial Member; Kirkby E - Member APPLICATION: Professional Misconduct - fail to comply with undertaking to Practitioner - Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct - fail to comply with undertaking to Practitioner MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter LEGISLATION CITED : Legal Profession Act 1987 Wade v Licardy (1993) 33 NSWLR 1 Royal Bank of Queensland v Ryan (1987) QLJ 97 CASES CITED: Vincent Cofini (1994) NSWLST 25 Law Society of New South Wales v Martin [2002] NSWADT 27 Allison v General Council of Medical Education and Registration (1894) 1 QB 750 Kennedy v Council of Incorporated Law Institute of New South Wales (1939) 13 ALJ 563 APPLICANT REPRESENTATION: I Wales, SC RESPONDENT R Campbell, barrister ORDERS: 1. That in light of the Tribunal's finding that he has been guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct Martin Otto Waterhouse be fined the sum of $2,000.00.; 2. That Martin Otto Waterhouse pay the costs of the Law Society of and incidental to these proceedings before the Administrative Decisions Tribunal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate