NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Law Society of New South Wales v Hooper [2005] NSWADT 174 DIVISION: Legal Services Division APPLICANT PARTIES: Council of the Law Society of New South Wales RESPONDENT Robert Francis Hooper FILE NUMBER: 052008 HEARING DATES: 01/07/2005 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 07/01/2005 DATE OF DECISION: 08/02/2005
BEFORE: Chesterman M - ADCJ (Deputy President); Barnes M - Judicial Member; Bennett C - Non Judicial Member APPLICATION: Professional Misconduct - breach of s. 61 of the Legal Profession Act - Professional Misconduct - breach of s. 62 of the Legal Profession Act - Professional Misconduct - forging signatures - Professional Misconduct - mislead client - Professional Misconduct - mislead third party MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal (Interim) Rules 1998 Legal Profession Act 2004 Allinson v General Council of Medical Education and Registration [1894] 1 QB 750 Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Foreman (No 2) (1994) 34 NSWLR 408 Dupal v Law Society of New South Wales, Unreported, 26 April 1990, Court of Appeal, NSW (BC9002508) CASES CITED: Law Society of New South Wales v Dennis (1981) 7 Fam LR 417 Law Society of New South Wales v Young [2001] NSWADATAP 38 Stanoevski v Law Society of New South Wales (No 2) (LSD) [2004] NSWADTAP 35 A Solicitor v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales [2004] HCA 1 APPLICANT REPRESENTATION: P Boyd, solicitor RESPONDENT No appearance ORDERS: 1. The name of the Solicitor is to be removed from the Roll of Legal Practitioners; 2. The Solicitor is to pay the Law Society's costs of these proceedings, as agreed or assessed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate