NSW Caselaw
CITATION: Parallel Lines International Pty Limited v Video-Drama Pty Limited [2007] NSWADT 84
DIVISION: Retail Leases Division
APPLICANT/CROSS RESPONDENT Parallel Lines International Pty Limited PARTIES: RESPONDENT/CROSS APPLICANT Video-Drama Pty Limited
FILE NUMBER: 035138; 045009
HEARING DATES: 20-21 March 2006, 11-12 October 2006
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 8 March 2007
DATE OF DECISION: 12 April 2007
BEFORE: Chesterman M - ADCJ (Deputy President); Fagg N - (Advisory) Non Judicial Member ; Griffiths G - (Advisory) Non Judicial Member
CATCHWORDS: Claim for payment of money - Damages - Unconscionability
MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter
LEGISLATION CITED : Retail Leases Act 1994
Commonwealth v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd (1991) 174 CLR 64 GPT Management Ltd & Anor v Spa Heaven Pty Ltd & Ors [2005] NSWSC 1043 CASES CITED: Laurinda Pty Ltd v Capalaba Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd (1989) 166 CLR 623 Sanpine Pty Ltd v Koompahtoo Local Aboriginal Land Council & Ors [2006] NSWCA 291 Shevill v Builders Licensing Board (1982) 149 CLR 620 Tyco Australia Pty Ltd v Optus Networks Pty Ltd & Ors [2004] NSWCA 333
APPLICANT/CROSS RESPONDENT A Vatner, agent (20 and 21 March, 11 and 12 October 2006)N Obrart, barrister (written submissions) REPRESENTATION: RESPONDENT/CROSS APPLICANT G Sirtes, barrister
ORDERS: 1. The Applicant/Cross Respondent ('the Applicant') is entitled to damages, to be assessed, from the Respondent/Cross Applicant ('the Respondent'), representing (a) the value of its goods seized by the Respondent on 5 October 2002 and (b) the amount of the security deposit paid by it pursuant to the former lease between the parties; 2. The Respondent is entitled to damages from the Applicant representing the rent due and unpaid under the lease as at 5 October 2002; 3. Within 28 days of the date of these reasons, the Applicant is to file and serve any further evidence and submissions relating to the identity and value of its goods seized by the Respondent on 5 October 2002; 4. Within a further 28 days, the Respondent is to serve any evidence and submissions in reply on this matter; 5. On being given reasonable notice, the Respondent is to permit agents of the Applicant to inspect at a reasonable time any goods of the Applicant held at premises owned or controlled by the Respondent or by any director of the Respondent; 6. The matter is set down for further directions at 9.30 a.m. on Wednesday 6 June 2007.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate